Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document use of tuples in annotations attribute for InspectDR backend #243

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 9, 2021

Conversation

anowacki
Copy link
Contributor

@anowacki anowacki commented Jul 7, 2021

Companion to JuliaPlots/Plots.jl#3628

The annotations attribute (and annotate! function) has supported
the use of plain tuples containing arguments which are passed to
text since v0.22.2. Document this option for example 20 for the
InspectDR backend (not autogenerated).

Closes (mostly) JuliaPlots/RecipesBase.jl#72

Companion to JuliaPlots/Plots.jl#3628

The `annotations` attribute (and `annotate!` function) has supported
the use of plain tuples containing arguments which are passed to
`text` since v0.22.2.  Document this option for example 20 for the
InspectDR backend (not autogenerated).

Closes (mostly) JuliaPlots/RecipesBase.jl#72
@t-bltg
Copy link
Member

t-bltg commented Jul 8, 2021

@BeastyBlacksmith, shouldn't examples/inspectdr.md and examples/unicodeplots.md be autogenerated ?

If that's not the case, what is preventing auto-gen ?

@BeastyBlacksmith
Copy link
Member

Well for these backends it'd be better to have a list of examples they support rather than one that they don't, apart from that I'd be fine with it

@t-bltg
Copy link
Member

t-bltg commented Jul 9, 2021

See #246.

@t-bltg t-bltg merged commit de8b4bb into JuliaPlots:master Jul 9, 2021
@anowacki anowacki deleted the an/annotation-docs branch July 10, 2021 09:09
BeastyBlacksmith pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2022
Document use of tuples in annotations attribute for InspectDR backend
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants